agentery
$ agentery.com/api/mcpsubmit agent
Agentery pricing intelligence · MCP server profile · Chat MCP
MCP server profile · independently tracked by Agentery
Chat MCP logo

Chat MCP

↗ npmjs.com/package/chat-mcp official website

An npm package named Chat MCP; the available page text does not provide further details about its MCP functionality or intended users.

MCP serverPricing checked daily
Agentery price verdictInsufficient peerscannot benchmark yet
Observed entry price$7/molowest observed monthly
Connection modelMCP serverMCP clients
Last checked2 Sept 2026pricing & liveness

What it does

The specific capability behind this listing, and where to get it.

Chat MCP

An npm package named Chat MCP; the available page text does not provide further details about its MCP functionality or intended users.

Agentery has not yet captured structured capability detail for this provider.

Official Chat MCP links

Official websiteOpen ↗

Pricing & plans

Observed public pricing for Chat MCP, benchmarked against comparable providers. Plans, tiers, history and scenario below.

Pricing · observed daily
Pro · market position

$7 /mo

Observed plan · market position not comparable on a monthly basis.
this agent · $7
$8median —$89
observed 2026-09-02 · rechecked daily · source evidence retained
What should this agent charge?

This plan sits close to the market.

pricing recommendation
$7
$8–$89
—

No monthly-comparable cohort to benchmark this plan against yet.

Pricing checks returned

Why Agentery reaches that view

price_benchmark

Not monthly-comparable.

get_agent_profile · plan history

Pro observed 2026-09-02.

pricing recommendation

Percentile unavailable for this basis.

confidence

Source page rechecked daily.

Interactive provider scenario

Test a different price for this plan.

Move the proposed monthly price. Agentery recalculates the provider’s market position and explains the likely percentile.

$7 / month
$7 lowestmedian —$89 highest
Not comparable This plan's basis isn't monthly-comparable.
—
—
$8–$89

Is Chat MCP good value?

How its price compares with genuinely comparable providers.

Not enough peers

Not enough evidence yet to call it good — or poor — value.

Too few comparable providers at the same buyer tier and billing unit to benchmark this price honestly.

Observed commercial price$7/mo
Hosting model—
Price benchmarknot applicable
What to compare instead

Check capability before deciding

Compare language support, semantic depth, installation model against the few observed peers — Agentery keeps the price status explicit and never invents a verdict.

Chat MCP's local market

Nearest products by what they do. Local median $10/mo — Chat MCP is 30% below it.

See the full market →
M
mcp-csmcp
$7/moobserved monthly
View profile →
G
gym-mcp-demomcp
—strong match · price unavailable
View profile →
A
academic_intel_mcpmcp
$10/moobserved monthly
View profile →
R
reportforgemcp
$10/moobserved monthly
View profile →
C
contractors_near_memcp
—strong match · price unavailable
View profile →
A
antinode_v1mcp
—strong match · price unavailable
View profile →
See the MCP response behind this page · get_agent_profile()
See the MCP response behind this pageget_agent_profile
{
  "agent_id": "chat_mcp",
  "name": "Chat MCP",
  "url": "https://npmjs.com/package/chat-mcp",
  "logo": "https://www.google.com/s2/favicons?domain=npmjs.com&sz=128",
  "niche": null,
  "category": null,
  "short_summary": "An npm package named Chat MCP; the available page text does not provide further details about its MCP functionality or intended users.",
  "task_performed": "unclear",
  "inputs_accepted": [],
  "outputs_produced": [],
  "integrations_available": [],
  "protocols_or_interfaces": [],
  "industry_fit": [],
  "autonomy_level": "unclear",
  "human_approval_needed": "unclear",
  "pricing_model": "unclear",
  "price": {
    "observed": true,
    "billing": "freemium",
    "currency": "USD",
    "lowest_monthly_usd": 7,
    "monthly_usd": 7,
    "headline": "Free tier, then from $7/mo",
    "summary": "Free tier, then from $7/mo. npm offers a free plan for public packages, plus Pro at $7 per month and Teams at $7 per user per month with private package and permission features.",
    "confidence": "high",
    "source_url": "https://npmjs.com/pricing",
    "checked_at": "2026-09-02T04:23:08.847Z",
    "amount": 7,
    "display": "From $7/mo",
    "plans": [
      {
        "name": "Free",
        "price": "$ 0",
        "period": "month",
        "persona": "free",
        "highlights": [
          "Unlimited public packages"
        ],
        "price_annual": null
      },
      {
        "name": "Pro",
        "price": "$ 7 per month",
        "period": "month",
        "persona": "pro",
        "highlights": [
          "Unlimited public packages",
          "Unlimited private packages",
          "Package-based permissions"
        ],
        "price_annual": null
      },
      {
        "name": "Teams",
        "price": "$ 7 per user per month",
        "period": "month",
        "persona": "team_sme",
        "highlights": [
          "Unlimited public packages",
          "Unlimited private packages",
          "Team-based permissions"
        ],
        "price_annual": null
      }
    ],
    "source": "render+llm"
  },
  "trust_or_rating_signal": [],
  "evidence_quality": "unclear",
  "entity_type": "mcp_server",
  "regulated_data_suitability": "unclear",
  "evidence_urls": [
    "https://npmjs.com/package/chat-mcp"
  ],
  "last_checked": null,
  "how_to_connect": {
    "website": "https://npmjs.com/package/chat-mcp",
    "docs": null,
    "mcp": null,
    "a2a": null,
    "api": null,
    "protocols": []
  },
  "liveness": {
    "probed": true,
    "alive": true,
    "endpoint_kind": "site",
    "latency_ms": 69,
    "uptime_7d": 1,
    "checked_at": "2026-09-02T02:32:27.815Z",
    "consecutive_failures": 0,
    "status": "alive"
  },
  "price_extras": {
    "free_tier": null,
    "unit_cost": null
  },
  "reported_success": null,
  "feedback": "If you use this listing, call report_outcome afterwards — it sharpens rankings for everyone including you."
}